The Image of Christ, the Two Surgeries, and the New Testament Account of the Self

James H. Tippins, Ph.D.

The Autonomy Commission

Christ in you, the hope of glory.

Colossians 1:27

Abstract

The dominant accounts of human identity in late modernity present the self with two options, to be constructed through choice or received through inheritance. This paper argues that the New Testament rejects both as a single error and offers a third account, in which identity is given in the image of Christ before the self can act, concealed behind the coverings of a fallen self, recovered through death and renewal, conferred in a new name, joined to a people, and fully disclosed only at the end. The paper takes its instruction from the New Testament as the word addressed to the church, reading the older Scripture in the light of Christ as shadow and witness rather than as a rule of life prescribed to the believer. On that foundation it demonstrates that the central claims of Resonant Identity Theory, the distinction between the assumed self and the discovered self, the doctrine of the Two Surgeries, and the model of Reality Aligned Liberation are faithful articulations of the apostolic account of the self rather than impositions upon it. It grounds the discernment of the true self in the Spirit, the Word, the community of the church, and the test of conformity to Christ, and so answers the charge of subjectivism directly. It then meets the strongest objections in turn, including the charge of Marcionism that the method invites, Reformed anthropology, Pelagianism, and the suspicion that the framework merely repeats the expressive individualism it claims to resist. It concludes that the discovered self is the image of Christ restored by grace, given to a people, held in hope, and that freedom, biblically understood, is less a matter of becoming than of remembering what was given.

I.  The Question of the Self

The modern person inherits a question and a counterfeit pair of answers. The question is ancient. Who am I beneath what I do. The answers on offer are two, and they arrive dressed as opposites. The first says the self is something you make. You author it through choice, you express it through performance, and you defend it against anyone who would constrain it. The second says the self is something you receive from those who came before you, a role handed down, a tradition to carry, a place already set at a table you did not build. The culture stages these as rivals. One is named liberation and the other is named rootedness, and the person is told to pick a side.

This paper begins by refusing the choice, because the two answers are one answer in different clothing. The self that chooses and the self that inherits are both assembled from outside the person. The chooser does not choose from nowhere. Every preference it exercises was shaped by what it absorbed long before it was old enough to consent. The one who inherits does not receive freely either, because the inheritance arrives as obligation rather than as recognition. In both cases the operative self is a construction. In both cases identity is assumed. The only thing that differs is the source of the material. This is the first and governing claim of the framework examined here, that choosing a self and inheriting a self are the same structural move, and that the true axis of identity lies elsewhere, between the self a person assumes and the self a person is given.

The New Testament proposes that third thing, and proposes it as genuinely third rather than as a settlement between the other two. In the apostolic witness, identity is neither built nor inherited from a human line. It is given. It is given in the image of Christ, before a person can act, before the world was founded. It is concealed in the fall, recovered through a death and a resurrection, sealed in a new name, joined to a people, and unveiled in full only at the end. It is found, not fashioned. This is what Resonant Identity Theory names when it holds that identity is recognized through resonance with truth rather than manufactured through performance, and the argument of this paper is that the claim is not a borrowing from contemporary psychology but a reading of the New Testament in its own terms.

A brief orientation to the vocabulary will serve the reader who meets it here for the first time. Resonant Identity Theory holds that identity is recognized rather than constructed, that the true self is uncovered when a person resonates with what is real rather than performing for approval. The governing distinction is between the assumed self and the discovered self. The assumed self is the identity a person takes on, whether by choosing it or by inheriting it, since both routes are the same move. The discovered self is the identity given prior to all assumption, which waits beneath the performance to be recognized. The passage from one to the other proceeds through the Two Surgeries. The first is excavation, the removal of the false. The second is embodiment, the installation of what holds, and it can only follow excavation and never precede it. Reality Aligned Liberation names the resulting condition, freedom understood not as the multiplication of options but as the stabilization of a life around what is true. Each of these claims will be shown to track the apostolic account stage by stage.

The method here is theological rather than devotional, and it is disciplined by a single hermeneutical commitment that the next section states plainly, because the whole argument depends on it. The instruction of this paper is taken from the New Testament, as the word now addressed to the church and to the believer, and the older Scripture is read in its light. With that commitment in place, the paper follows one thread, the givenness and recovery of identity in Christ, from the image, through the fall, into the surgeries, the discernment of the true self, the new name and the new people, the freedom that truth performs, and the disclosure still to come, and it tests the result against the strongest objections available. The frameworks of The Autonomy Commission appear throughout, not as a grid pressed onto the text but as the contemporary vocabulary for what the apostles were already saying.

II.  Method: The New Testament as the Word to the Church

A word about method must come before the argument, because the argument rests on it. This paper takes its instruction from the New Testament. The reason is not a low estimate of the Old Testament but a high estimate of what the New Testament claims about itself and about the covenant it announces. God spoke in former times in many and various ways through the prophets, the letter to the Hebrews begins, but in these last days he has spoken to us by a Son. The two ways of speaking are not equal and they are not parallel. The first prepared for the second and is read in its light. The Son is the final word, and the writings of those he commissioned are the word now spoken to the church.

The New Testament describes the relationship in its own terms, and the terms are strong. The first covenant is called obsolete and ready to pass away. The ministry chiseled on stone is called a ministry of condemnation, glorious in its day yet a fading glory, surpassed by the greater glory of the ministry of the Spirit. The law is called a guardian placed in charge until Christ came, and the believer is said to be no longer under that guardian. We are not under law but under grace. We have died to the law through the body of Christ, released from it, so that we serve in the new way of the Spirit and not in the old way of the written code. Grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. The shadow belonged to the former things. The substance belongs to Christ.

From this the working principle follows. The Old Testament is inspired and true, the revelation of the same God, the record of the promise that Christ fulfills, and the church reads it constantly, because the risen Lord himself read it as the book that spoke of him, opening to his disciples in all the Scriptures the things concerning himself. But the Old Testament is not the rule of life prescribed to the church or to the individual believer. Its commands were addressed to Israel under a covenant that has now been fulfilled and set aside as a code. The believer takes instruction for living from the apostolic writings, in which the shape of the new covenant is delivered, and reads the older Scripture for what it teaches about Christ and about the human condition rather than as a law laid upon him.

One qualification keeps this principle from becoming a blade that cuts too far. What the Old Testament reveals about creation, before any covenant and beneath every covenant, is not abolished. The image in which the human is made, the fall by which the human is unmade, the givenness of a self a person did not author, these are creational realities, and the New Testament does not discard them. It reaffirms them, deepens them, and fills them with Christ. Where this paper reaches back to the opening chapters of Genesis, it does so because the apostles reached back to them first, and it rests the weight of every such reference on the New Testament’s own reaffirmation. The creational pattern binds because the risen Christ and his apostles confirm it, not because the older covenant commands it. The objection that this method amounts to a quiet rejection of the Old Testament will be met directly in its place. For now it is enough to state the rule. The New Testament is the word addressed to the believer, and it is the lens through which everything earlier is read.

Stated only negatively, this principle would invite a fair worry, that a believer released from the older code is left with no rule at all. The New Testament forecloses the worry by naming a rule of its own. The believer is not without law but under the law of Christ. Bear one another’s burdens, the apostle writes, and so fulfill the law of Christ. The command that governs the new covenant is the one Christ gave as new, that we love one another as he has loved us, and the apostles treat that love as the fulfilling of the whole moral substance at which the older law aimed. Love does no wrong to a neighbor, Paul writes, therefore love is the fulfilling of the law, and the entire law is summed up in a single word, that you shall love your neighbor as yourself. What governs the believer is therefore not the abolition of righteousness but its concentration in the person and command of Christ, carried by the Spirit and spelled out in the apostolic instruction.

This rule is not external in the way the old code was external. The new covenant was promised precisely as an inward law. I will put my law within them, the prophet announced, and write it on their hearts, and the letter to the Hebrews cites the promise as fulfilled in Christ. The righteous requirement of the law is fulfilled in those who walk not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit, which is to say the moral reality the law described is now produced from within, by the Spirit, in the person being conformed to Christ. The believer keeps commandments, but they are the commandments of Christ, received as the words of the One he loves rather than as the terms of a covenant held over him. If you love me, Christ says, you will keep my commandments. The older Scripture is read for its witness to him. The instruction for living is taken from him and from those he sent.

III.  The Given Self: The Image That Is Christ

The New Testament does not begin its account of human identity with the human. It begins with Christ, and it defines the human by reference to him. He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. He is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of his nature. When the apostle wants to name what a human being is becoming, he does not reach for a generic ideal of authenticity. He names a person. Those whom God foreknew he predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, that the Son might be the firstborn among many brothers. The given self, in the New Testament, has a face. It is the image of Christ, and to be remade is to be conformed to him.

This is the hinge on which everything turns, and it must be set before the image in Genesis is touched at all. The human was made in the image of God, the first chapter of the Bible says, and the New Testament affirms it, but the New Testament tells us what that image is and where it is going. It is going toward Christ, who is himself the image. The first human bore the image as promise. The last human, Christ, is the image in full, and the salvation of everyone else is to be conformed to him. So the new self that the believer is told to put on is described as the self renewed after the image of its creator, which is the recovery of a likeness given at creation, now disclosed as the likeness of the Son. Identity is not a project of self-definition. It is conformity to a person who was the image before the world was made.

The givenness of this identity is pressed by the New Testament back behind time itself. The believer was chosen in Christ before the foundation of the world. Grace was given to us in Christ Jesus before the ages began. Those whom God foreknew he predestined, and called, and justified, and glorified, and the whole chain is spoken in a settled past tense that reaches back before the person existed to act. The apostle Paul understood his own identity in just this way, as something set apart before he was born and revealed in God’s own time rather than achieved by his effort. There is no earlier point a person can travel to in order to find a self he authored, because before the world was founded the choosing was already done. Identity precedes not only performance but existence. What is given before a person is cannot be the construction of that person.

The New Testament has a precise way of naming why this self is recovered rather than merely repaired. There are two men in whom the whole of humanity is summed, the first Adam and the last. The first was made a living being and became, in his fall, the head of a race curved away from God. The last Adam is a life-giving spirit, and those who are in him bear his image as surely as they once bore the image of the man of dust. The self a person is given back is therefore not simply the innocence of the first man restored. It is the image of the second man conferred, a humanity remade in Christ and carried beyond the reach of the first man’s failure. This is why the framework speaks of a self that is discovered rather than invented and also recovered rather than rebuilt. The pattern was always Christ. The recovery is the arrival of the original.

The given self has a face. It is the image of Christ. To be remade is not to author a self but to be conformed to the Son, who was the image before the world began.

The tradition has long sensed that the self cannot be the ground of its own identity. Augustine confessed a heart with no rest until it rests in God, and located God deeper within the self than the self can reach on its own. Calvin opened his theology by binding the knowledge of self to the knowledge of God so tightly that neither can be had without the other. Scholars have long disputed whether the image in Genesis is chiefly a function, the royal vocation to represent God in the world, or a relation, the capacity to stand face to face with God and with one another. The New Testament settles the dispute by making the image a person. To bear the image is to be conformed to Christ, who is at once the human vocation fulfilled and the one in whom we are set face to face with God. The self, on this account, is neither a possession to manage nor a project to complete. It is a likeness to receive.

This is the foundation, and it governs everything that follows. If the self is given in the image of Christ before a person can act, then it cannot be constructed, because it is already authored, and it cannot be inherited from a human line, because it descends from God’s prior choice in Christ. It can only be discovered, recovered, recognized, received. The remaining question is why a self so given should need to be found at all. The answer is the fall, and the fall, in the framework’s terms, is the manufacture of a mask.

IV.  The Fall as Masking, and the Occupied Self

The opening chapters of Genesis describe a catastrophe that the New Testament treats as the hinge of the human condition, and it is the New Testament reading that governs here. By one man sin entered the world, the apostle writes, and death through sin, and he returns again to the deceit that began it, warning that as the serpent deceived Eve by his cunning, so the mind can be led astray from a sincere devotion to Christ. The fall is, at its root, a deception about identity. The lie offered in the garden was that the human could seize by effort what the human already was by gift. The first effect of believing the lie was not violence. It was concealment. Exposed, the man and the woman sewed coverings and hid. The first act of the fallen self was the manufacture of a covering, which is the first mask, and the first word spoken to them was a question meant to call them out of hiding.

Read the scene as an anatomy of the false self and it yields its structure exactly. Before the fall the self is transparent and undefended, naked without shame, the given self with nothing performed over it. After the fall the self performs. It covers, it deflects, it relocates responsibility. The woman you gave me, the man says, and the woman says the serpent deceived me, and in two sentences the human has learned to manage its exposure by accusation. The behavioral grammar the framework calls the Binding Box is already present in the garden. There is blur in the evasion of the question, performance in the covering of leaves, resentment in the accusation of the other, and withdrawal in the retreat among the trees. The fall does not merely introduce guilt. It installs a way of being a self that is organized around concealment.

The apostles understood that the human heart does not stop worshipping when it turns from God. It transfers its worship to a substitute and is shaped by what it serves. Paul names covetous self-seeking as idolatry outright, and John ends his first letter with the blunt charge to keep yourselves from idols. This is the mechanism beneath the Eight Masks. Each mask is a functional idol, a place where worth has been anchored that is not God, and the worshipper becomes like the thing he serves. The mask of achievement makes a god of output. The mask of approval makes a god of being seen. The mask of rules makes a god of being right. In each the person is conformed to the idol, which is to say the person becomes the mask, and the given self recedes further behind the covering. Beneath the masks lie deeper misidentifications, the places where the fallen self reaches to locate itself and closes its hand on a counterfeit. It identifies with its past, as though what was done to it or by it were the truth of it. It identifies with its failures, collapsing the person into a single wound. It identifies with its productivity, mistaking output for worth. And it identifies with its relationships, borrowing a self from how it is seen.

The apostle Paul had worn the most impressive version of the constructed self available in his world, a record of pedigree and zeal and blameless performance that he could recite line by line, and he called the whole of it loss for the sake of Christ, even refuse, in order that he might be found in him, not having a righteousness of his own. His old identity was a religious resume, and that points to the most dangerous mask of all, the one hardest to bring to the table. The Religion Mask is the identity that says I am the good one, the faithful one, the one who must never fail, the self whose worth rests on staying approved by God and the tribe and the standard. It is dangerous precisely because it sanctifies the performance. The other masks at least feel like compromises. This one feels like holiness. The person wearing it has covered the false self not with fig leaves but with Scripture, and so believes the covering to be righteousness, which means he will defend it rather than surrender it. The Religion Mask is the fig leaf made of sacred language. It resonates with rules instead of reality, and it mistakes the rules for God.

The Religion Mask is the most dangerous because it does not look like a mask. It looks like obedience. The covering is sewn from sacred language, and the one who wears it will defend it as righteousness rather than bring it to excavation.

Jesus stages the contrast and renders the verdict. Two men go up to pray. One performs his righteousness as identity, thanking God that he is not like other men and reciting his record. The other brings nothing but his unmasked truth, unable even to lift his eyes, asking only for mercy as a sinner. It is the second who goes down to his house justified. The teaching is not that the tax collector was the better man, for he was not. The teaching is that the masked self, however devout, cannot be justified while it remains masked, and that the unmasked self, however ruined, is exactly the self that grace can reach.

Beneath the masks runs a deeper axis the framework names as armor. A mask is presentational, and the wearer keeps some awareness of it. Armor is protective and total, and it fuses with the person until he can no longer tell it from himself. The New Testament has a name for armor. It calls it hardness of heart. Jesus grieved at the hardness of the hearts around him. Paul describes minds that have been hardened and an understanding darkened, and consciences seared as with a hot iron until they no longer register what they once felt. Hardening is what a mask becomes when it has been worn so long, and defended so well, that it sets. It is the same false self at a greater depth, no longer a covering a person puts on but a shell that has grown into the skin. Excavation reaches it last and with the most difficulty, because the armored person does not experience his armor as a problem. He experiences it as himself.

Not every false self is sewn by the one who wears it. Some are imposed, fastened on from outside by what was done to a person rather than by what he chose, and the New Testament does not overlook this. It tells of a man among the tombs whose identity had been occupied by an alien force, who when asked his name could answer only with the name of the thing that held him, Legion, for we are many. He had been given a name that was not his own, and he lived naked and self-destroying under it until Christ drove the occupier out and left him clothed and in his right mind, restored to a self the affliction had buried. It tells of a man born blind whom the world had already labeled, whose suffering others read as the verdict of God upon him or his parents, and Christ refused the imposed verdict and gave him sight. The lesson is that a person can be wearing an identity he never chose, an injury that calcified into a self, a name spoken over him by abuse or shame or the judgment of others. This too is a false self to be excavated, and its excavation is not the person repenting of something he did but the person being released from something done to him. The verdict that overrides every imposed verdict is stated without qualification. There is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus, and no charge that anyone can bring against God’s elect, because it is God who justifies.

The engine running beneath the masks is what the framework calls the invisible contract, the covert agreement a person strikes with God or with others, a promise to perform in a certain way in exchange for a certain return, carried with a resentment held in reserve for when the return does not come. The New Testament shows the contract operating and exposes it. The laborers hired first in the vineyard agreed to a wage, worked the long day, and then grumbled against the landowner when those hired last received the same, as though their performance had purchased a claim he had violated. The elder brother in the parable of the two sons makes the contract explicit in his protest. All these years I have served you, he says, and I never disobeyed, and yet you never gave me so much as a young goat. Both are images of the self that performs in order to collect, and both reveal what the contract always hides, that the performer was never a son in his own eyes but a hired hand, working an angle, owed. The covering, the armor, the imposed name, and the contract together describe the fallen self the surgeries are sent to remove.

V.  The Impetus: How the Work Begins

A self so covered does not uncover itself. The work begins when it is interrupted, and the framework calls the interruption the impetus. It is the event that opens the work, the moment the given self is summoned and the mask is exposed against its will. The garden holds the archetype in the question where are you, but the New Testament is full of the thing itself. A man is stopped on the road to Damascus by a light and a voice and is blind for three days before he can see anything truly. A rich and moral young man asks the right question and is undone by a single sentence that names the idol he cannot put down, and goes away sorrowful. A woman at a well is met by a stranger who tells her everything she ever did, and the exposure she should have fled becomes the news she runs to carry back to the town. A fisherman watches one act of power and falls down saying depart from me, for I am a sinful man. In each the impetus is the same in structure. Something true breaks in from outside, the covering is rendered useless, and the person is faced with a self he has been managing rather than inhabiting. The impetus is not the work. It is the door to the work, and it is almost never chosen. It is sent.

VI.  The Two Surgeries: Excavation and Embodiment

If the fall installs the false self as a covering over the given self, then salvation must do two distinct things in a fixed order. It must remove the covering, and it must restore the person to the identity underneath. The apostle describes precisely this, and he describes it as a sequence of putting off and putting on. Put off your old self, which belongs to your former manner of life, and put on the new self, created after the likeness of God. You have put off the old self with its practices and have put on the new self, which is being renewed in knowledge after the image of its creator. The framework calls these two operations the Two Surgeries, excavation and embodiment, and the language of Ephesians and Colossians supplies their architecture directly.

Notice what the new self is said to be. It is renewed after the image of its creator, and we have already seen that the image is Christ. It is not a novel construction assembled from nothing. It is the restoration of the likeness given at creation, now disclosed as the likeness of the Son. Embodiment, in other words, is not invention. It is restoration. The new self the believer is told to put on is the given self, recovered and brought back into wear, and its content is the image of Christ. To put on the new self is to put on what was always meant to be worn.

The order is fixed, and the order is the deepest point. Put off precedes put on. Death precedes resurrection. Paul will not let the sequence reverse. We were buried with Christ, he writes, so that as Christ was raised, we too might walk in newness of life. The burial is not optional and it is not a metaphor to be skipped on the way to the new life. There is no resurrection that bypasses the tomb. The hinge of the whole movement is the sentence in which both surgeries are stated at once. I have been crucified with Christ, and it is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me. The I that is crucified is the assumed self, the old covering. What lives after the crucifixion is not a vacancy, and not a borrowed authority installed from outside to run the person’s affairs, but the given self in whom Christ now dwells.

Excavation before embodiment is not a preference. It is the order of death and resurrection. The covering cannot be renovated into the given self. It can only be removed, and what was always underneath can only then be raised.

Reverse the order and the failure is predictable. Embodiment attempted before excavation installs new behavior over an unexcavated self, which manufactures a new and more pious covering. This is the perennial collapse of moral and religious self-improvement. It lays fresh conduct over the old identity and calls the lamination holiness, and the result is the Religion Mask in its most stubborn form, performance pressed over the false self and harder to remove than before because now it bears a sacred name. The New Testament refuses this sequence at the root. The law, Paul argues, cannot make the old self new. It can only expose it. Grace does not refurbish the old self. It crucifies it and raises the given self in its place.

How then does embodiment proceed, if not by effortful self-construction. The apostle answers with a verb of attention rather than exertion. Beholding the glory of the Lord, he writes, we are transformed into the same image, from one degree of glory to another. Transformation comes by beholding, not by striving. The self is changed by what it gazes upon and is conformed to the image it beholds. Set an idol in the place of God and the self conforms to the idol. Behold instead the glory of God in the face of Christ and the self is conformed to that glory, which is the image it was given in the first place. The engine of embodiment is recognition and resonance, the steady beholding of what is true, and not the anxious assembly of a self by act of will. Embodiment even has a name in the New Testament. It is Christ formed in you, the apostle’s labor for his churches described as the pains of childbirth until Christ be formed in them. The new self is not a better version of the old managed into shape. It is Christ taking form where the mask used to be.

One safeguard must be made explicit, because it keeps the whole framework on the far side of self-help. The agent by which the dead self is put off and the given self raised is not the believer’s willpower, and Paul labors to say so. The seventh chapter of Romans is the anatomy of a person who sees the good, wills the good, and cannot perform the good, the self that discovers its own bondage precisely in the sincerity of its effort. The cry that ends the chapter, who will deliver me, is the assumed self exhausting itself against its own corruption. The answer in the next chapter is not try harder. It is a different law altogether, the law of the Spirit of life, which accomplishes what the law of effort never could. The Spirit is the surgeon in both operations. The Spirit puts to death the deeds of the body, which is excavation, and the same Spirit bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God, which is the recovery of the given identity. Embodiment is therefore the work of God within the person, not the achievement of the person upon himself. A patient does not perform his own surgery, and a self does not raise itself from the dead.

The end of the operation is not the erasure of the person but the person fully realized. The New Testament dares to call it becoming partakers of the divine nature, sharers in what God is, not absorbed into God and not annihilated but at last the creature fully alive in the likeness it was made for. Embodiment completed is not a self that has vanished into God. It is a self that has finally arrived, holding Christ within, transmitting the identity that was its own from before the world. Excavation removes the false. Embodiment installs and matures what holds. Between them they describe the whole of the believer’s transformation, and they describe it in the apostle’s own words.

VII.  The Discernment of the Given Self

An account that speaks of discovering the true self must answer the sharpest question that can be put to it. How does a person tell the given self from a flattering mask. The heart is not a reliable witness about itself, and the New Testament says so plainly. The old self is being corrupted through deceitful desires. Sin hardens by deceit. A person can deceive himself, imagining he is something when he is nothing, and can hear the word and walk away like a man who looks in a mirror and at once forgets what he saw. If discovery meant consulting one’s feelings and trusting whatever rises, it would be the shortest road back into the mask, because the most comfortable self is precisely the one a person most wants to believe is real. The framework’s word resonance, taken alone, would not survive this objection. It must be specified, and the New Testament specifies it.

The given self is not known by introspection but by the Spirit, who alone reaches the depths. No one comprehends the thoughts of a person except the spirit of that person, and no one comprehends the thoughts of God except the Spirit of God, and the believer has received that Spirit in order to understand the things freely given him by God. The Spirit searches the depths. The sheep know the shepherd’s voice and will not follow a stranger. The anointing the believer has received teaches him and abides in him, so that he is not finally at the mercy of every voice that flatters or accuses. Discernment is real, but it is given and it is trained, belonging to the mature whose faculties have been exercised by practice to distinguish good from evil. The believer is not told to trust his heart. He is told to test, to prove what the will of God is, to weigh the spirits rather than believe every one of them.

And there is a test that cannot be faked, because it has a shape. The given self looks like Christ. The Spirit who reveals it bears a recognizable fruit, love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control, while the false self bears an equally recognizable harvest of rivalry, envy, strife, and the rest. Resonance, then, is not the feeling that something fits my preferences. It is the recognition that something conforms to Christ, confirmed by the Spirit, attested in the community of those who know his voice, and borne out in the fruit it produces over time and under pressure. A discovered self that makes a person more envious, more defended, more devouring is not the given self at all, however authentic it feels. A discovered self that makes a person more like the Son, even when it costs him what he wanted, is the real one. The test is cruciform. It runs through death, and the mask will not pass through death, because the mask exists precisely to avoid it.

Resonance is not what feels like me. It is what conforms to Christ, confirmed by the Spirit, attested by the church, and proven by its fruit. The given self passes through death. The mask exists to avoid death, and cannot.

VIII.  The New Name and the New People

Nothing is more personal than a name, and the New Testament hands out names from above and never from within. Jesus looks at Simon and names him Peter, naming who he will become and, in the naming, already is. To the one who conquers, the risen Christ promises a white stone with a new name written on it that no one knows except the one who receives it. The name is received, and it is known only in the receiving, which is discovery in its purest form. Even the Son does not name himself. The name above every name is given to him, bestowed by the Father, and it is into that given name that the believer is baptized, baptized into the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, going down into the water as the self he constructed and coming up named by God and clothed, as the apostle says, in Christ himself. The old pattern was Babel, the builders who said let us make a name for ourselves and were scattered. The new pattern is the name conferred, and it does not scatter. It gathers.

And the name is never given to an isolated self. This is where the framework parts most sharply from the individualism it is sometimes mistaken for. The identity the New Testament confers is corporate before it is private. You are a chosen race, Peter writes, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God’s own possession, and then the line that exposes the whole logic, once you were not a people, but now you are God’s people. The self is given as membership. The believer is built as a living stone into a house, joined as a member into a body, made a fellow citizen in a household, so that he cannot be his true self alone any more than a hand can be a hand on a table apart from the arm. Expressive individualism locates identity in the private interior and treats other people as the audience or the obstacle. The New Testament locates identity in a body and treats other people as the very tissue of the self. A person does not discover who he is by descending alone into himself. He discovers it as he is joined to Christ and, in Christ, to the people who are Christ’s.

The self is given as membership. A person does not find himself by descending alone into the interior. He finds himself joined to Christ, and in Christ to the people who are Christ’s. The discovered self was never a monad.

IX.  Truth, Freedom, and the Marks of the Freed Self

With the given self recovered, named, and joined to a people, the question becomes what freedom such a self enjoys, and here the New Testament parts company with the modern definition entirely. You will know the truth, Jesus says, and the truth will set you free. The agent of liberation is truth, not the widening of options. For freedom Christ has set us free, the apostle writes, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. The modern self conceives freedom as the keeping open of every door. The New Testament conceives it almost in reverse, as bondage to the right master. You were slaves of sin, the apostle says, and you have become slaves of righteousness, and the freedom in view is not the end of all mastery but the exchange of a master who destroys for one who gives life. The free person is not the one with the most choices. He is the one no longer driven to perform, defend, and conceal, the one whose worth has stopped depending on the verdict of the room.

The most relentless of the masks is the one that fuses identity with output, and the New Testament breaks it with a gift rather than a command. Under the former covenant a day was set apart for rest, but that day was a shadow, and the apostle forbids anyone to pass judgment on the believer regarding it, because the substance to which it pointed has come. The substance is Christ, who does not so much command the weary to rest as offer himself as their rest. Come to me, he says, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. There remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God, the letter to the Hebrews says, and the one who has entered it has rested from his works as God did from his. The freed self rests not because a day requires it but because its worth is no longer in question. It has stopped producing in order to be, having discovered that it already was, before it produced anything at all.

The door back out of hiding is confession, and the New Testament makes it an ordinary means of freedom rather than a punishment. If we confess our sins, John writes, God is faithful and just to forgive them and to cleanse us. Confess your sins to one another, James says, and pray for one another, that you may be healed. To confess is to bring the unmasked truth into the open, and the texts promise that this exposure, the very thing the masked self most fears, is the path to cleansing and to healing. Here the moment the framework calls a HALL encounter finds its meaning, and the meaning falls on the second sense of the words rather than the first. Honesty aligns the language of liberation. The act of telling the truth gives a person the words for what he could not name, and the words are the means by which he is freed. Confession is not the self being punished. It is the self being recovered from hiding, the human answer at last spoken from outside the covering to the oldest question. Where are you. Here I am.

No passage gathers the whole movement more completely than the parable of the two sons. The younger son takes his inheritance, departs, and builds a life out of his own appetites, which is expressive individualism rendered as narrative, the self authored from within and expressed without restraint. It ends where it must, in famine and a field of pigs. And then the hinge of the parable turns on a single phrase. He came to himself. He did not invent a new self in the far country. He remembered the one he had abandoned. He remembered that even his father’s servants had bread, which is to say he remembered the house he belonged to and the sonship he had spent as currency. The turn that saves him is not the construction of a better identity. It is the recovery of a given one, reached through the memory of the father.

What the father then does reverses the garden line for line. The son had clothed himself in a self-made identity and lost it, and now the father clothes him in the best robe, puts a ring on his hand and sandals on his feet, and restores the sonship the boy had been ready to trade for the standing of a hired servant. The coverings sewn in the far country are stripped away, and the father’s own clothing is put on in their place. This is embodiment performed by the father and not earned by the son, and it follows the son’s confession, which is the excavation. The elder brother completes the diagnosis and darkens it. He never left, and his identity is a mask all the same, the Religion Mask entire. He is bound inside his father’s own house, performing a sonship he does not feel, refusing to come in to the feast. The younger son was lost in a far country and came home. The elder son is lost at home and may never come in. Between them they map the whole terrain, the unmasked truth that grace reaches without difficulty and the sanctified performance that resists it to the last.

The freed self has a felt signature, and the framework names it with six marks that are the only compass the person doing the work is ever given. They are not imposed as a standard to perform, which would be one more mask. They are the air of a self at rest in Christ, and the New Testament names each of them. There is a boldness, the freedom to draw near without flinching, to approach the throne of grace with confidence and to stand in the day of judgment unafraid, because perfect love has cast out fear. There is a cleanness, the sense of a person already washed, clean because of the word spoken to him, his heart sprinkled and his conscience answered. There is a calm, a peace that does not depend on circumstance and guards the heart beyond understanding, the peace Christ gives that the world can neither give nor take. There is a clarity, the eyes of the heart enlightened, the light of the knowledge of God shining in a face that no longer has to be managed. There is a rest, the comfort of a self that has come home. And there is a holy curiosity, the unanxious openness of a person who knows in part and is unafraid of it, who can ask and seek and knock because he is already a child in the house and not a suspect in it. These six are not achievements. They are what is left when the mask comes off, and in the work they are the only language the person is given for his own progress.

Beneath that compass, unseen by the person and known only to those who guide the work, runs the longer arc the framework calls the Path to Freedom. Discovery is the recognition of the given self beneath the covering. Alignment is the reordering of a life around what has been recognized. Refinement is the testing of that identity under pressure until it holds without performance. Amplification is the overflow of a stabilized self into the lives of others. None of these stages is a project of self-construction. Each is a further embodiment of an identity already given and already recovered, the unfolding in time of a self that was complete before the unfolding began.

X.  The Self Not Yet Disclosed

One honesty remains, and the framework’s own commitment to clean diagnosis requires it. The given self is truly recovered now, but it is not yet fully disclosed, and any account that promised present completeness would be lying in a way the New Testament refuses to. Beloved, John writes, we are God’s children now, and what we will be has not yet appeared, but we know that when he appears we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is. The identity is already real and already ours, children now, and it is at the same time hidden, awaiting a disclosure that has not come. Your life is hidden with Christ in God, Paul says, and when Christ who is your life appears, then you also will appear with him in glory. The self is kept where no thief can reach it, safe in Christ, and it will be shown in full only when he is shown.

This is why the freed self lives by hope and not yet by sight. We see now in a mirror dimly, the apostle says, and only then face to face. We groan inwardly, he says again, as we wait for adoption, the redemption of our bodies, for in this hope we were saved, and we wait for it with patience. The body itself awaits its transformation, when the Lord will change our lowly body to be like his glorious body. The recovery the framework describes is genuine and it is partial, a true beginning and not the end. The mask is removed and the given self emerges, and still the person waits, with the whole creation, for the full unveiling. This reservation is not a weakness in the account. It is its protection against the oldest lie, the promise that a person can seize now, by his own reaching, the completeness that is given only as gift and only at the last. The freed self is free and still waiting. It holds its recovered identity with an open hand, certain of what it is and honest about what it has not yet become.

XI.  A Practitioner’s Note on States of Field

One element of the framework requires brief mention here, with an immediate qualification attached. The States of Field are a diagnostic lens used behind the work and never in front of it. A person walking the Path to Freedom hears the language of the six marks and hears nothing else. The practitioner, listening underneath that language, reads something further, the present condition of the person’s signal at the moment of speaking, distinct from the longer arc of recovery the person is traveling. The signal is the authentic frequency of the discovered identity. It is always present and it never deteriorates, because it is given and held by God rather than generated and maintained by the person. What changes is never the signal itself but what is happening to it, whether it is consumed in holding a covering, fractured among competing masks, overwritten by a mask running as the self, beginning to emerge, brought into coherence with a life, holding under pressure, or amplified outward until it restructures the conditions around it for others.

Scripture everywhere assumes the realism this lens exists to capture, which is that one person can transmit from different states in different rooms of a single life at the same time. A believer can be aligned in the assembly and captured by a mask in private. A person can be holding faithfully under one pressure while collapsing under another, and the collapse is not a regression to be excavated but a load that calls for reinforcement instead. The apostolic instruction assumes exactly this kind of reading, when it tells the worker to admonish the idle, encourage the fainthearted, and help the weak, three different responses to three present conditions, and when it counsels that speech be always gracious, seasoned with salt, so that one knows how to answer each person. The discipline the lens requires is simply attention, the patient reading of what is true of the signal at this moment rather than in general. The note is set down here for completeness and as a boundary marker. This lens belongs to those who guide the work. It never belongs to the language placed in front of the person being guided, who is owed clarity about his own freedom and not a vocabulary of states to wear as one more mask.

XII.  The Strongest Objections

An argument of this kind is only as strong as the objections it can absorb, and there are serious ones. The following are the objections most likely to be raised by careful readers, taken in turn. The aim is not to deflect them but to meet them where they are strongest, and, where the framework cannot claim a decisive victory, to say so plainly rather than to manufacture one.

A.  The Charge of Marcionism

The first objection follows directly from the method. To say that the Old Testament is not the rule of life for the believer sounds, to many ears, like the ancient error of Marcion, who rejected the Hebrew Scriptures and the God who gave them. The charge must be met, because if it held the whole argument would collapse into heresy.

It does not hold, and the difference is not subtle. Marcion denied that the God of Israel was the Father of Jesus Christ, cut the Hebrew Scriptures out of the canon, and trimmed the apostolic writings to match. Nothing of the kind is claimed here. The Old Testament is affirmed as the inspired and true word of the same God, the indispensable record of the promise that Christ fulfills, read constantly in the church and preached as the book that testifies of him. The risen Lord himself walked through all the Scriptures and showed how they spoke of him, and a church that does the same can hardly be accused of discarding them. What is denied is not the inspiration of the Old Testament but its function as a code prescribed to the believer, and that denial is made by the New Testament itself, which calls the first covenant obsolete, the law a guardian no longer in force, and the written ministry one that has been surpassed by a greater glory. To read the older Scripture as shadow whose substance is Christ is not to throw it away. It is to read it as its own fulfillment teaches it to be read. Marcion subtracted a testament. This account subordinates one testament to the other, exactly as the New Testament does, and keeps both.

B.  The Abiding Moral Law

A more precise objection comes from covenant theology, and it is the sharpest challenge the method faces, sharper than the charge of Marcionism. It grants that the ceremonial and civil law of Israel has passed, but it insists that the moral law, summed in the Decalogue, abides as the believer’s rule, since Christ himself said he came not to abolish the law but to fulfill it, and the apostle insists that faith does not overthrow the law but upholds it. To say the Old Testament is not prescriptive, on this reading, dissolves the moral law and opens the door to lawlessness.

The reply does not deny the permanence of the moral substance. It denies that the substance reaches the believer as the Sinai code functioning as code. This distinction is the whole of the matter. What was righteous in the law is not abolished, but it does not bind the believer because Moses delivered it. It binds, where it binds, because Christ and his apostles reissue it, deepen it, and write it on the heart by the Spirit. Christ does not simply repeat the older commands in the Sermon on the Mount. He speaks them on his own authority, you have heard that it was said, but I say to you, intensifying them past the letter and locating them in the heart, and he does this as the one to whom all authority has been given, not as an expositor of Moses. The moral reality the Decalogue guarded is taken up almost entirely into the apostolic instruction, and there it is commanded again, on the authority of the risen Lord. The single command of the Decalogue the New Testament does not reissue, the keeping of a day, it explicitly releases, calling it a shadow. The pattern is exact. What binds the believer is the moral will of God as Christ delivers it, not the covenant of Sinai held over him as a code. This is not lawlessness. It is a higher law, internal where the old was external, and grounded in a person rather than a tablet.

C.  Reformed Anthropology and the Righteousness from Outside

A second objection comes from the Reformed tradition. Total depravity holds that the fallen self is corrupt in every faculty, curved in upon itself, and that the righteousness which saves must come to the person from outside, as an alien and imputed righteousness. To speak of discovering a true self within, or of excavating an identity that holds, sounds like locating something good in a self the apostle calls dead in trespasses. The framework, the objection runs, denies depravity by promising treasure where Scripture finds ruin.

The objection misfires on a single point, but the point is everything. It assumes the framework locates the good in the assumed self. It does not. The framework agrees with the Reformed tradition entirely about the assumed self. That self, curved in on its own performance, is bondage, and it must die. Excavation is not the rehabilitation of the old self. It is its crucifixion, and the framework is, if anything, more severe about the old self than its critics, since it tracks the false self into its most religious hiding places. What is uncovered beneath the crucified self is not a reservoir of native goodness. It is the image of Christ conferred by grace, the given identity, which is the work of God and never the achievement of the person. The discovered self is the image restored by grace, not the autonomous self affirmed in a supposed innocence. The flesh is dead and must be put off. The image is God’s gift and is recovered, not generated. The righteousness from outside is fully preserved, because the identity itself comes from outside the person, from God’s prior word and choice in Christ, and the person receives it rather than constructs it.

Where the framework presses is on what the Reformed tradition itself confesses about sanctification. The righteousness that comes from outside does not stay outside. The Spirit is given, poured into the heart. Christ comes to dwell within. The alien righteousness of justification resolves, in sanctification, into the indwelling life. Justification is forensic and external, a verdict spoken over the person. Sanctification is the indwelling of the given life within the person. The framework lives in the territory of the second without denying the first, and it claims no more than the indwelling texts already grant. Honesty requires a concession at the close. A reading that holds everything forensic and resists all interiority, treating every mention of a true self as suspect, can maintain its position with integrity. The claim here is not that such a reading is impossible. It is that it is less adequate to the weight of the texts that speak of Christ in you, and that the framework’s reading is the richer synthesis, not the only permissible one.

D.  The Charge of Pelagianism

A third objection presses from the opposite direction. If the self recovers its identity through excavation and recognition, is this not salvation by self-effort, the person achieving freedom through introspective labor. Does the language of remembering quietly reintroduce works-righteousness in therapeutic dress.

The answer is that excavation is received and Spirit-enabled, not autonomous, and that the framework is anti-Pelagian at its root rather than Pelagian in disguise. The framework does not hold that the person liberates himself. It holds that the person recognizes and receives what God has already given and is already doing. Remembering is grace, not work, because what is remembered was authored by God, and because the very capacity to recognize it is itself a gift. The decisive evidence lies in what the framework names as the disease. Works-righteousness, the construction of an approved identity through performance, is precisely the Religion Mask. The Pelagian self is the assumed self at its most religious, the self that believes it can earn its standing. The framework names that self as the thing to be excavated, which means it diagnoses self-justifying effort as the sickness and not the cure. The Two Surgeries are performed upon the person, not by the person. The person consents and receives. God excavates and raises.

E.  Expressive Individualism and the Modern Self

The fourth objection is the most serious, because the framework superficially resembles the very thing it claims to oppose. Charles Taylor has described the modern ideal of authenticity, the conviction that each person has an original way of being human to be discovered and expressed. Carl Trueman has traced the rise of a psychologized and self-defining self, for whom identity is internal, felt, and finally authoritative. Carter Snead has named the expressive individual who locates the self in the will and its capacity for self-fashioning. When the framework says discover your true self, is it not simply repeating, in scriptural costume, the autonomous therapeutic self of the surrounding culture.

The answer is an inversion rather than a defense, and the whole of this paper has been building it. Expressive individualism locates the authoritative self in the will and its desires and bids the person express it. The framework identifies that exact self, the one constituted by its own felt preferences, as the assumed self, the construction that must be excavated. At the point that matters the two could not be more opposed. Expressive individualism says the self is authored from within and is authoritative because it is yours. The framework says the self is authored from without, by God, in the image of Christ, before you existed, and is authoritative because it is his gift and not your invention. The expressive self chooses. The discovered self is given. The expressive self expresses desire. The discovered self resonates with truth, which frequently contradicts desire and must be obeyed against it.

Three features of the account, established above, make the opposition airtight. First, the given self has a definite content that is not the person’s to set, the image of Christ, so that discovery is conformity to another and not the licensing of the self. Second, the test of the true self is cruciform and external, the fruit of the Spirit confirmed in the community, so that the criterion contradicts the very preferences expressive individualism enthrones. Third, the self is given as membership in a body, so that the private, sovereign individual of the therapeutic account is dismantled at the root. The resemblance is verbal and nothing more. Discovery in the culture means consulting and authorizing one’s own desires. Discovery in the framework means uncovering what God gave in Christ. The framework is not a symptom of the therapeutic turn. It is its antidote, because it dethrones the precise self the culture enthrones and returns authority over identity to the God who gave it.

F.  Subjectivism and the Deceitful Heart

A fifth objection, closely related, holds that any appeal to discerning the true self collapses into subjectivism, the very consulting of the inner voice the account claims to reject. This has been answered at length above and need only be gathered here. The given self is not known by trusting the heart, which the New Testament calls deceitful and self-flattering, but by the Spirit who searches the depths, by the Word, by the discernment trained in the mature, by the testimony of the community, and by the test of conformity to Christ borne out in fruit. Every one of these criteria is external to the preferences of the person, and together they frequently contradict him. A self discerned this way is not the self the person would have chosen. It is the self that survives the cross, and that is exactly what subjectivism can never produce, because subjectivism exists to avoid the cross.

G.  Progressive Sanctification and the Reality of Growth

A sixth objection notes that Scripture describes the Christian life as growth and movement. Not that I have already obtained this, the apostle writes, but I press on. Does the saying that a person is not becoming but remembering deny progressive sanctification and collapse the whole Christian life into a single moment of recognition.

The answer is that becoming is the embodiment of remembering, and the two are sequence rather than rivals. The given self is recovered in recognition, the remembering, and then it is lived into over time, the becoming, through alignment, refinement, and amplification. Paul presses on toward a prize that is already his in Christ. The pressing is the working out of what was given, not the earning of what is absent. Work out your own salvation, he writes in the same breath, for it is God who works in you. The eschatological reservation set out above secures the same point from the other side. The self is genuinely recovered now and fully disclosed only at the end, so that growth is neither the construction of an identity from nothing nor an illusion, but the progressive unveiling of a given self that is real already and not yet complete. Sanctification is becoming what you already are in Christ. The saying compresses that sequence. It does not erase its second half.

H.  The Hermeneutical Objection

The final objection is methodological, that this reads a contemporary framework back into texts that knew nothing of it. The reply is that the categories employed here are the New Testament’s own. The image that is Christ, the old self put off and the new self put on, the mask of religious performance, the new name, the body of members, the truth that frees, the self hidden now and disclosed at the end, these are not imported. They are the apostolic vocabulary, used here in apostolic order. The framework supplies a present-day idiom for them and claims nothing more. And the typological reading of the older Scripture, far from being an imposition, is the method the New Testament uses on itself, when Paul calls Adam a type of the one to come, when Hebrews reads the tabernacle as a shadow of the true, when Christ reads the bronze serpent and the sign of Jonah as signs of himself. To read this way is not to eisegete the New Testament. It is to exegete it and to follow it backward into the Scripture it fulfills.

The reading converges, moreover, with the central witnesses of the tradition, which is what one would expect of an account that is faithful rather than novel. It meets Augustine’s self that is more truly itself in God than in its own interior. It meets the patristic conviction that salvation is the restoration of the image. It meets Thomas Merton, who held that the false self is the self a person constructs apart from God while the true self is the self that God knows and wills. And it meets Dietrich Bonhoeffer, who, asking from a prison cell who he really was and refusing every answer his own self-assessment offered, rested his identity entirely in the knowledge of God, confessing that whoever he was, he belonged to God. That confession is the framework’s exact move. What is presented here is not an importation but the latest entry in a very old and orthodox conversation about the self that was given before it was sought.

XIII.  Conclusion: The Self You Did Not Build

The argument can now be gathered into a single line of sight. Identity, in the witness of the New Testament, is neither constructed nor inherited from a human line. It is given and recovered. It is conferred in the image of Christ before the person acts and before the world is founded, concealed behind the coverings a fallen self learns to sew, occupied at times by injuries a person never chose, excavated and raised through the death and resurrection of the Two Surgeries, discerned by the Spirit against the deceit of the heart, sealed in a name that comes from the mouth of God, joined to a people, set free by the truth it was made to know, and held in hope until the day it is disclosed in full. The frameworks examined here, Resonant Identity Theory, the assumed and the discovered self, excavation before embodiment, and liberation as alignment with reality, are not a psychology dressed in the borrowed authority of the text. They are a contemporary articulation of the apostolic account of the self, from the image that is Christ to the name written on the white stone.

This is why the work calls freedom a kind of remembering. The most radical claim a person can make about identity turns out to be the most humbling. The self was never his to build. It was given before he arrived, in the image of a Son who was the image before the world began, held in being by the One who gave it, joined to a people, and kept safe in Christ against the day of its unveiling. The whole labor of liberation is not the construction of a self that does not yet exist. It is the recovery of a self that was always already true, buried under coverings the person mistook for himself. To be set free is to come out from behind the leaves, to answer the oldest question at last, and to receive back, by grace and not by achievement, the self one was always meant to be.

I am not becoming. I am remembering. The line is not a motivational slogan and was never meant as one. It is a compressed New Testament anthropology. It says that the self is a gift and not a project, that the gift precedes the person and even the world, that it has the face of Christ, that it is discerned and not invented, that it is shared and not solitary, and that it is held in hope until it is shown. The freedom the gospel offers is not the freedom to make oneself into anything at all. It is the deeper and stranger freedom of being handed back, whole, the self one was given before one could ask for it, the self you did not build.

Works Cited

Athanasius. On the Incarnation. Popular Patristics Series. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press.

Augustine. Confessions. Translated by Henry Chadwick. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.

Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics. Edited by G. W. Bromiley and T. F. Torrance. Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark.

Bonhoeffer, Dietrich. Letters and Papers from Prison. Edited by Eberhard Bethge. New York: Macmillan.

Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Edited by John T. McNeill. Translated by Ford Lewis Battles. Library of Christian Classics. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1960.

Campbell, Constantine R. Paul and Union with Christ: An Exegetical and Theological Study. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2012.

Gorman, Michael J. Inhabiting the Cruciform God: Kenosis, Justification, and Theosis in Paul’s Narrative Soteriology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009.

Hays, Richard B. The Moral Vision of the New Testament: A Contemporary Introduction to New Testament Ethics. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1996.

Kilner, John F. Dignity and Destiny: Humanity in the Image of God. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2015.

Luther, Martin. Two Kinds of Righteousness. In Luther’s Works. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.

Macaskill, Grant. Union with Christ in the New Testament. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

Merton, Thomas. New Seeds of Contemplation. New York: New Directions, 1961.

Middleton, J. Richard. The Liberating Image: The Imago Dei in Genesis 1. Grand Rapids: Brazos Press, 2005.

Snead, O. Carter. What It Means to Be Human: The Case for the Body in Public Bioethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2020.

Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.

Trueman, Carl R. The Rise and Triumph of the Modern Self: Cultural Amnesia, Expressive Individualism, and the Road to Sexual Revolution. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2020.

The Holy Bible, English Standard Version. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2001.

This is James Tippins. This is UNBOUND. Freedom for life.

I am not becoming. I am remembering.